Future League Rules

@ Noodles, Warships have been one of the first sqauds to not play all pilots. In fact they have had them sit on US and watch and only fly minimum. Don't make comments that are deliberate lies.

When? lol When we play friendlies we even encourage the teams against to play ALL their pilots if they have any sitting.

So if your going to name, names which i refrained to:

Your squad just decides to leave during friendlies cos your loosing =)

Your squad pulled the tag change about 3 times. During the 4xsquad, when the c/o was asked for, you all said you was C/o. So please, shut up.

If your gonna say we sit pilots when we don't have too, please provide the evidence.

now noodle why you have to say such BS to cover what you guys have done in the past

warships have made FD sit 2 players when FD had 8 & Ships had 8 when FD was GE & then want to play all next half when ships were GE. not this past snl league but the snl league before last.

well anyways my oppinion on match tags is you fight a battle to win or do your best at it & using

tags to confuse your enemie is part of a strategy. i see no wrong squads doing this. & about max players

in a match, all squad should allways fly all pilots when present. if teams are equal, now somtimes squads will fly say 7v7 when they GE but when some squads go GB that 7th player suddenly left or had to go & isnt present no more . this pee's me off. i say if this happens & you agreed to 7 player in first half then 2nd half should remane the same even if that player is gone. 7v6 .

PS: oh noodle sandman can call his self CO or others in FD because he is me & sandman work together & we are equal in our eyes. who cares what you think

now somtimes squads will fly say 7v7 when they GE but when some squads go GB that 7th player suddenly left or had to go & isnt present no more . this pee's me off. i say if this happens & you agreed to 7 player in first half then 2nd half should remane the same even if that player is gone. 7v6 .

I agree m8, whatever pilots you started with you end with no matter what, we never had that problem with this snl as far as I remember and I was at every match, to add a pilot 2nd half or lose one is BS!

Oh well this looks like this might turn ugly (hope not) but will watch and see

Sandman, Noodles, and Major_Pain: The topic of this thread is: "Future League Rules". It is not: "What they did last week, month, or year."

If you guys want to rehash the past, please start your own thread to do so. I promise I won't derail it.

Thanks.

Sry Temp, I thought reffering to Ships doing this in past was directly related to your comment. I just named names as Noodles said. This was only done since he said they had no part in it. Thats crap, and anyone can go on uk forums in past and read the related topics. I thought we were all adults and could fess up to there actions. How can we change future rules if we can't talk bout how the were abused in the past? So the ships were singled out, they used it as a Tactic in the past and Noodles denied it, I called him out. Big deal. Are we gonna find a solution to the problem or argue whos right? I have done things in the past that I shouldn't but I don't deny them.

now noodle why you have to say such BS to cover what you guys have done in the past
warships have made FD sit 2 players when FD had 8 & Ships had 8 when FD was GE & then want to play all next half when ships were GE. not this past snl league but the snl league before last.

Lol Please go get the recording =) or name the SNL year, i have pretty much all the recordings of SNL. Unless its the couple SNL i missed due to being inactive or elite, then i wont have them of course.

@ Temper. My original post was aimed at no one in particular, but pasting my views i get attacked by the usual squad =)

@ Sandman. Just funny man. As i said said to Dei, please post the evidence. Just because you've said something, thats means you've called me out and your right? Typical ignorance from you yet again. In the light of this, theres only 1 scenerio i can think Sal would sit people, if they were rookies who just wanted to watch. Depends how far back you are trying to go, depends if we had any rookies @ SNL times, but i don't recollect any, but sal can clear that up. I don't really remember many occassions we got 8 for SNL, don't remember having that many US pilots flying at once =D But y'know =)

As i said above, shut up, if you wish to continue this slander, email sal, or start a new topic as Temper said.

Good, I'm glad you all got that out of your systems. Now back to the discussion of Future rules, right?

SALUTE All M8s!

Why Temper? Let them dicuss the past. I find it interesting the Rules of this event are now being consider for a change, especially since most teams are now up to speed in following them. I thought the framework of the rules were to help your Team in it quest to win the match! This is not like one of those FUN events, this is a team against team event. Teams want to WIN against other TEAMS!

1. Why can not teams fly with alias TAGS! It sounds like it pulls the team together to fly as a team, as mention above and You can research whos tag is whos prior to the match. It does help protect the shooters of your team during the match against the other team.

2. If a TEAM chooses to fly 6 against another team, so what? IF a TEAM decides it wants to fly it's best 6 GE flyers than it fly the six. On the other hand, the best six GB flyers may not be the same pilots as the pilots that flew the 6 GEs. Thus, that team may have pilots setting on the US base. Maybe 6 is a good number to manage during a match against another team. Is it really a big deal! The COs can work out the details before the match, but shouldn't have to be force to change their plans if they only want to fly 6 pilots. Teams want to Win these matches for the pride of their team.

The above 2 items are within the framework of the rules. Was not these same RULES used by Teams to WIN these MATCHES in the past!

I say, keep the rules in place and lets finish the event. Why fuss about this now. I see it as a positive in helping train new pilots in the ART of flying to WIN in these Matches the right way, per the code of conduct and within the framework of the rules!

USHA has come a long way in learning how to do these matches! USHA flys these matches to WIN!

SALUTE!

USHA_ACTION

USHA PILOT FOREVER!

Yepper Temper nailed this one, and you have to give him credit

for that!

Tags huh?, Well a "Tag" should be short and to the point as follows;

1. Eamples only: poilot elects to have the nick; "Bullet", now in FFA arena and

he is new this is how it appears on screen> plane ~FOf_Bullet.., but the FOf act-

ually obstructs the visual of the plane in general, I for one do not like to read

a book to see who the pilot is and where in the hell is the plane!

2. Example: FD_Medic_911 ( I assume this pilot in real life is a fire depatment

medic to call 911).., What if "Tag": COLORMEGONE_GE, might look like:

~SdL_COLORMEGONE_GE, if this pilot is a rank Squad Leader, show rank simple;

2- silver bars for captain: ll or " or a Lieutenant : l or simplify and give a ranking

by colored stars small * make a FOf or Cdt: bronze colored star at the end of nick

not in front: Bullet*_GB or Bullet _GB* and for no squad Bullet*, and higher the rank

what ever silver, gold * etc.

3. Conclusion: Yes keep only one chosen "Tag" through out the pilot's career on here,

and as for these 'Top Guns" Tags that are well known, I say join the crowd of being

targeted and picked out! In chess we call Chess Masters who avoid play with Novices

or lower ranking players cowards, for fear they will lose their rank, not being sought

out or targeted: So if you are that good, then your skills will keep you on "Top", Temper

is right, I want to know if I'm going up against BSS_Joker or whom ever is high on that

totem pole, a Kill is a kill, either Cdt or SdL they both count as a 1 kill score, unless you

get the same rank from Cdt to SdL for that kill! Sorry If I strayed from the major topic

subject matter, but I do agree with you on keeping 1 assigned tag and very short at that!

Action, I'm not trying to get any rules changed for this competition. Read the thread topic again. Future League Rules. I'm not making a fuss about anything, I only started a discussion.

My answer to both your questions about the rules are in my 1st post.

Why not let them discuss the past? Because it would degenerate into a flame war imo. Is there some reason they cannot start another thread if they want to do so?

So, I ask once again for everyone to stay on topic and remain civil.