A lot of times, there's a lot of traffic being monitored on the BTAC. Often I select a particular blip being monitored by clicking on it.
However I also would like to temporarily place my mouse over other blips, without clicking on them, and have the mouseover cause that blip's details to appear. That way I'll never lose focus on the blip I originally selected once I move the mouse cursor away.
Future Suggestions
Post a replyBtac Suggestion - Mouseover Dots
8 posts
Great thought - that would feature on my list!
-- Rip
-- Rip
would like a nav-marker in big tac.. an not a full flank ahead...
when u want to move hastly,,u loose heara-billity,,, and cant relye on sonar,, if u slow down they start opening sodas around u....
sooo a point to nav to,,without cuting enginges...
nick
when u want to move hastly,,u loose heara-billity,,, and cant relye on sonar,, if u slow down they start opening sodas around u....
sooo a point to nav to,,without cuting enginges...
nick
Any possiblity of the same 500m B-TAC display properties at the 1km setting?
(specifically the near real time heading & movement)
(specifically the near real time heading & movement)
Hay good ideas I like em all but any chance of getting a depth for sub's and U-boats in the tac?
I mean those AI ships seem to know the sub's exact depth all the time!
An example I was in the American campaigns running at 10 depth for torpedo fire a boat came out of know where and I lowered the periscope and hit crash dive the boat dropped it's DC's right next to my hull and they exploded it was like it know right where when and how deep to set the DC's.
I mean those AI ships seem to know the sub's exact depth all the time!
An example I was in the American campaigns running at 10 depth for torpedo fire a boat came out of know where and I lowered the periscope and hit crash dive the boat dropped it's DC's right next to my hull and they exploded it was like it know right where when and how deep to set the DC's.
How about being able to check on hull status of ships with the B-TAC?
both friendly and enemy. Friendly status would be more accurate seeing as how they would be giving you an accurate report. While accuracy of enemy status could be affected by distance, number of friendly witnesses, level of difficulty.
I think it would provide excellent feedback for situational awareness.
As of now, you don't know how bad/good off anyone is except yourself.
IMO it would give the gamer feedback, let them know if what they are doing is having an effect.
both friendly and enemy. Friendly status would be more accurate seeing as how they would be giving you an accurate report. While accuracy of enemy status could be affected by distance, number of friendly witnesses, level of difficulty.
I think it would provide excellent feedback for situational awareness.
As of now, you don't know how bad/good off anyone is except yourself.
IMO it would give the gamer feedback, let them know if what they are doing is having an effect.
I agree
It's not likely we will show you the health of a ship in the BTac, but we will be showing you the health of the ship with damage - makes it chancy to take on a stronger enemy.