COD5 - Admin rights

I will be reviewing the commands available to the different levels of admin rights within B3 for COD5 very soon. Hopefully this weekend.

We are going to move fully to an admin ranking system. This is to accomodate the dynamic nature of our club. (ie FLH can be moderators without kick or ban ability. New club members can be brought along according to their in-game maturity index. )

for example:

(20)FLH leadership - warn, spam, etc. ( I will make the list official this weekend )

(40)ToW Admin 1 - + notice

(60)Tow Admin 2 - + kick

(80)Tow Admin 3 - + ban

(90)Game Ops - + putgroup

(100)Server Ops - Everything

It will also require a reset of B3 to take a stronger role in automated warning timeouts and kicks durations. Ie. if you warn a player for something, that warning has a timer, that timer will run out after minutes, hours or days depending on the severity of the warning.

(Ie. an abuse warning should time out after 10 minutes and three warnings would get you kicked automatically for 1-minute. That way an admin without kick or ban rights can issue warnings and ultimately let the bot carry out the kick. )

FOR AFK's - Can we please activate an inactivity timer. PLEASE!

I am guessing that the server is set to team damage reflective to let the admins play versus babysit team killers. It was a successful move in COD4.

With an inactivity timer and reflective team damage all we really have to do is watch for the really abusive/disruptive players.

Since the run and gun server is pretty much wide open, i would suggest we only ban explosives aimed at the opponents spawn point at round start.

The language filter for COD5 must remain, it's part of who we are as a club. I have been to other COD5 servers that have the same rule, it does help cut down on the abusive players. I would be OK with removing OMFG and WTF from the list.

We need to create a new set of rules for COD5 - pub RNG.

Here is a start:

1. No Racism

2. No Advertising

3. No Recruiting

4. No Swearing

5. No Spamming Spawn at Round Start

(Please reply to help us get this all in proper working order)

Spud,

I think we are pretty close you and I to being on the same page.

One area that we are not describing the same.. or may be on different page is the users them self. I don't see a difference between FLH and/or ToW club.. or anyone else that we would give Admin rights too.

To further explain.. it makes no difference to me if an FLH or ToW person is at any given level. I don't see certain levels ONLY being available to a ToW club member, etc. I see the 'person" and the job they are given, what priv's they have earned and been approved by Game Ops.

I do not see level 90 as "Game Ops"

I do not see level 100 as "Server Ops"

Tiger and I do need to be at level 100 because we admin the B3, etc. Also at level 100 are server level command I do not want anyone to have except those assigned to the game server box and with certain conditions etc. So far.. only Tiger and I qualify for that level. In the future, Tiger or I might want someone else in at the level.

Level 90 needs to be for "LEAD" Game Ops type of people only... not just "game ops".

I'm also convinced.. we need to MOVE certain priv of the STOCK setup to other levels. For example there are a couple commands at the 100 level that need to be moved to the 90 level. There are a couple of commands say at level 80 that also need to be moved down to lower levels. There might be some commands at lower levels that need to be moved up.

This is why I was trying to get you to post the commands .. and what levels you needed them in so David could do that at set up time.

Soon as I can.. I'm gonna take the B3 config for cod5 post it here.. and we can then 'visually' let tiger know the changes we want... and he can do so quickly. I've done it myself in the past, it worked no problems. The only problem comes with the "Group Names or Level Names" .. we need to get those changed before we get a lot of people assigned. As we all know.. its possible and built in to allows a user to be a member of more than one group.. but for our purposes.. we have no need for that (I think).

Hope I have not fecked up this post too much and got my points across correctly ... much fast in TS I think when I see you next

/tbar