Future Suggestions

Aircraft Carrier Classes

44 posts

Post a reply

Aircraft Carrier Classes

#11
You are correct, it is Bearn. It was decommissioned and we have it re-constituted for Portugals use in protecting the Azores.

Yes, we are heavily arming the carriers. We are also creating the planned but never created BattleCarriers. Starting with the conversion of the Bismark and the Tirpitz.

Here's a peek at our workups:

Bismark

Image

and Tirpitz

Image

Aircraft Carrier Classes

#16
Hmmmmm, reminds me a bit of the USS FDR (Midway Class)
USS FDR, Midway Class

in it's original config, but several years after "these" conversions. Of course the Midway class hulls were laid as BB's in 43, then converted into CV's during construction.
You should have posted the Introduction on the main page as well :D

Introduction

The following series of essays and pictures regard a fictional set of Imperial Japanese naval vessels, and others, developed by my friend Admiral U. Furashita. These units never sailed the seas, except in the Admiral's imagination, as part of his "Victory Through Seapower" World War II wargame. I hope you are as amused by them as I am.

Just like Enigma, I guess :P

Aircraft Carrier Classes

#18
Hang on, something isn't right about that Bismark model. I mean the side elevation has the of the flight deck shadow on the starboard side of the hull, but the plan view shows the flight deck on the port side of the ship.
You're right, you can also see it when you look at B-Turret. On the starboard shot the flight deck is clearly in front of B-Turret, but judging from the shot from above the flight deck must be behind B-Turret.

When you look closer you'll also see the secondary guns in front of B-Turret, below the flight deck, but in a starboard shot they shouldn't be visible at all.

Seems to be an inverted shot showing Bismark's port side. ;)

Return to “Future Suggestions”